🔗 Share this article

Only two days before the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the record participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative area. That truly was unexpected. The independent held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the inequalities we face.