🔗 Share this article

In a per curiam ruling, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to implement a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that may create up to five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, grants a request by the state to lift a federal judge's ruling that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the fine federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

The federal court had previously found that Texas had probably grouped voters by their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries created after the most recent national count for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling occurs during a countrywide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in efforts to reshape the U.S. House map to protect a slim Republican hold. Usually, boundary revision happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State top lawyer welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a release, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that secures representation favorable to his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic officials decried the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic figure stated the court had yet again damaged its credibility by approving a discriminatory map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.