🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", described extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."